by Uwe Siemon-Netto
Evenings in front of the TV have never been my idea of merriment, but in these trying days they seem unavoidable. So here I sit listening to America’s media stars interviewing each other, an annoying substitute for real journalism.
Watching TV has become a trifle less time-consuming since all liberal presenters kowtow President Obama with such embarrassing conformity that I have found it pointless to listen to them. My dilemma is that those posing as conservatives, for example Lou Dobbs of CNN, make my Lutheran blood boil almost as much.
As a Lutheran I believe that
in our diverse vocations, which include journalism, we must serve our neighbors
out of love; in so doing we render the highest possible service to God.
Now if I belonged to the tiny
minority of TV personalities not in lockstep with the new administration what
would I focus on? I suppose I would first and foremost express my concern for
my weakest neighbors, unborn children, who since the ascent to power of a
relentlessly “pro-choice” new President are in graver danger than ever.
But guess what? The fate of
millions of babies is far from being the top hot-button issue of Obama’s
opponents in the media. Instead they fluster about endangered Second Amendment
rights. I admit that as a foreigner I see this insistence on the right to bear
arms as an American idiosyncrasy comparable to the Chinese obsession with
sucking ducks’ feet. Thus insensitive to this particular topic, I will not opine
about it other than to say that it must surely be secondary to an unborn
infant’s right to live.
Then there is the media’s recurring whine about how bad everybody else is, particularly Mexico, which is habitually portrayed as being unwilling or incompetent to get its gang violence under control, a menace now spilling across the border into the United States.
Now, I accept that some of these media complaints are valid, but so is surely the Mexican rejoinder that if it weren’t for junkies and narcotics dealers in the U.S., Mexican drug gangs would see little merit in killing innocent people and each other down there. Is America, may I ask, not a market-driven society?
Theologically speaking, it seems to me that an old German axiom I learned in boarding school applies here: “How about first sweeping under your own bed?” Speaking as a Lutheran, this too should actually count as a premier act of neighborly love, and therefore a fulfillment of a divine vocation.
Thinking about drug violence, I always wondered about Singapore, a highly developed state without a narcotics problem. Singapore, you see, hangs drug dealers. Singapore is of course an overwhelmingly Chinese city with exotic tastes. Its people do suck ducks’ feet, and they do hang criminals. Could we not learn something from their strange habits, excepting perhaps the more eccentric features of their diet?
I am not 100 percent in favor of capital punishment, especially when not swiftly and justly applied. So let me posit an alternative, which might sound a little harsh but still might qualify as a Lutheran course of loving action.
Way up to the Northwest of this continent, the United States possesses a chain of islands. They are called the Aleutians, whence nobody will ever be able to swim away from. They could be a perfect choice as a latter-day American Australia where you ship people you do not want to have a near your children.
So here’s the deal: We entice the tiny Aleut population with attractive real estate offers to move to friendlier climes, perhaps even to warm Arizona or New Mexico. Then everybody in possession of more than 5 grams of heroin or cocaine is paid a one-way fare to one or the other of those chilly islands.
There, heavily armed instructors will teach drug pushers how to build igloos, kill seals with bows and arrows, harvest the beasts’ blubber, and raise vegetables hydroponically. Then the new settlers will be left to cope with their new environment. Occasionally a C-130 aircraft will fly overhead, dropping “C” rations for nutritional change and pharmaceuticals to be applied by expatriates with medical degrees, of which there will doubtless be some among the new Aleutian residents.
Here is the charm of my proposal: Once housed in the Aleutian Islands, drug peddlers will never again be able to travel to America’s southern border and trade with Mexican drug lords. There will be peace. And who knows? This arrangement could even produce political benefits of the sort theologians must normally remain silent about: NAFTA’s salvation could actually come from an icy island where drug dealers and junkies snuggle up in igloos enjoying the blubber of slain seals.
I was once upon a time a dyed in the wool, ditto head, conservative.
I am still conservative, but I just do not care so much about taxes, wars, drugs, guns and immigration anymore.
For me now, it is all about abortion. There almost is nothing else and if there is it just doesn't come close. This is the issue, this will always be the issue until it is gone. It is the American holocaust.
As far as media, I must say that Roman Catholic media has done a tremendous job in centering on this issue - they cover the other issues in a fair and impartial way, but they go after Obama and abortion as if it is the most important thing.
This needs to spread amongst all with a voice and an audience.
I do not like socialism. As one who lived in Europe and goes there quite often I see American Captialism as superior to what is in Europe, but I can live in either, we all can. I like guns and the second ammendment, but I can live without guns. The basic fact is that thousands of children die daily, because murder in utero is allowed and its protection is being expanded and championed by the murderer in chief, Barak Obama.
Posted by: Jon Townsend | March 31, 2009 at 09:46 AM